|
This case virtually ended his career, as he resigned from the force soon after. This is a beautifully written, well-researched book that dissects the murder investigation that surrounded an appalling murder that occurred in England in 1860. It is a page-turning mystery, as well as a wonderful portrait of those involved in this human drama.When three year old Saville Kent was found murdered, his throat savagely cut, in the outhouse of the home of his well-to-do parents, suspicion immediately fell upon the family and their servants, as the murder happened during the night when all were sleeping and nothing was taken from the house. Though he eventually accused one of the family members of the crime, the evidence proved insufficient to bind the accused to trial and provoked a public outcry against Whicher. This elegantly written true crime thriller will keep the reader riveted to its pages. After all, who else might have murdered this innocent child.
His investigative methods and deductive reasoning would later come to be embodied in many of the fictional detectives that would prove to be popular. It is a fascinating story replete with historical detail about the era in which the murder took place, as well as those persons involved. Whicher would eventually be vindicated years later, when an amazing turn of events occurred. This murder engendered outrage and much press coverage throughout England, and when the local police came up empty handed, Scotland Yard stepped in, sending their best detective, Jonathan Whicher, to spear-head the investigation. What Whicher surmised from his investigation was that, indeed, one of the family members was responsible. This book not only details the murder investigation, it places the events that transpired in the context of the history of the times, as well as the social mores that dominated.
Bravo.
Whicher actually do detective work or did his 'suspicions' carry the day. The title really says it all, "The Suspicions." Basically this book has a lot of history about detectives, how they started, etc. Did Mr. Was it suspicions, assumptions, guess work or.what. Love to read your thoughts.
Suspicions of Mr. Whicher. Mr.
There are so many missed opportunities here, and so many uninteresting threads that are tugged until they snap. Working on this case wears him out emotionally, psychologically and physically. Whicher is one of those books that makes me very sad, because of what it could have been.
Whicher, who is the London detective assigned to the case, has his own suspicions (hence, the title) about who has committed this crime, and they are in opposition to the beliefs of the local constabulary. Quite a shame given the subject matter - it could have been a cracking read. In 1860, a three year old boy is murdered within his own home.
It's quite clear that the author had very little to work with, so she padded the tiny amount of data with information such as the origins of words like "clue," "sleuth" and "red herring," rather than providing what readers would be more interested in, like the thoughts and feelings of the family involved.Other than pointing me in the direction of detective novels that take the Road Hill Murder as their inspiration, and making me interested in Wilkie Collins, I didn't get much out of Suspicions of Mr. A tip for other readers would be that, if you don't already know who committed this crime, don't view the photographs before reading the book, because they give the culprit away.
Ah. Samuel Kent the father of Saville was pin pointed as chief suspect by one newspaper, while one of his daughters Constance received fan marriage proposals. The public took so much interest in this case it was like a fever that had swept over the nation; every person in Britain seemed to have their own angle of this one case. From Moonstone (1868) by Wilkie CollinsKate Summerscale has written an in-depth descriptive and probing account about a Murder which took place in the early hours of Saturday 30th June 1860, the victim Saville Kent, age just three. Scotland Yard after many weeks finally interceded, Enter: Detective Jonathan " Jack Whicher", who was one of eight original Scotland Yard detectives.Jack Whicher forty-five, rose through the ranks quickly with his uncanny ability to recall information, especially visual images, with great accuracy and clarity (photographic memory).
Printing laid out floor plans of Road Hill House, re-constructing the scene of a crime and an in-depth account of each member of the household and servants alike. not yet. I say probing because this particular Murder caused shock waves through Britain at that time. Whicher needed to be on this case right from the start being brought in so late; what were his chances of succeeding. and a nasty thumping at the top of your head.
*Pausing for thought here, "Doesn't this still go on today".This whole case had taken it's toll on all involved, Jack Whicher came away from this case a broken man, he had his suspicions; but lacked proof. Whicher also had a string of successes under his belt, prone to working undercover operations had apprehended a thief who had made off with a Leonardo da Vinci painting and also foiled a plot from revolutionaries who attempted the assassination of Napoleon III in Paris. Also the local police did not want interference from London so everything was taking off at a slow pace, interviewing the locals of course, plodding along and going no where. It was a major sensation for the newspapers; who couldn't get enough of it.
Letters flooded into Scotland yard; with ideas of who could have committed such an evil crime in this particular household. Whicher bared nothing but a heavy weight on his shoulders from this case, he died in 1881.Summing up; what I loved about this book, well; it's a historical piece; as well as crime based and yet through all the courtroom drama, testimony and speculations; it does leave us readers to draw on our own conclusions from this riveting case. "Do you feel an uncomfortable heat at the pit of your stomach, sir. Whicher was what they called around this time a new breed of detectives and many writers/authors at that time switched tactics from writing about Villains to the new victorian/modern detective. Whicher didn't waste any time in invading the privacy of the Kent's family household and homed in on certain family members, nursemaids, interviewing servants anybody in the area on that fateful morning.Meanwhile Britain went into overdrive with Whicher-fever; books were written, pamphlets were issued, theories upon theories flooded into the press, a journalist bluffed his way into the household had a good look around and even questioned family members. The case was an organized chaos, details caught in confusion. Later that same morning he was found by servants in a most disturbing way; stuffed down a make shift toilet; the boys throat had been cut. Kate Summerscale also goes into terrific details; understanding motivation and the psychology and she doesn't stop on just suspects and murder, Summerscale gets descriptive on all different subjects in general.
It will lay hold of you.I call it the detective-fever. We veer off in all kinds of directions; sometimes I felt we veered too far; and you have to think back at stages on the original topic at hand, but your more or less guided through each stage of this book brilliantly. Author Charles Dickens was Intrigued by it all and was already familiar with the detective leading this investigation, while Author Wilkie Collins borrowed ideas from it.England, early morning June 30th 1860, Road Hill House located five miles from Trowbirdge Wiltshire, Saville Kent aged three years ten months was found missing from his bed. Murder on the streets of London was one thing but a child to be taken from a bedroom in a remote area of a middle class family home while they all slept was quite another.The suspects: At first the local police were reluctant to disturb the Kent's family household; they had never experienced anything quite like this, so there was some hesitation about intruding on family privacy. Five years later a trail begins on a confession that doesn't even add up and by the time the trail had finished even Queen Victoria had intervened a prison sentence was passed instead of an execution. Kate Summerscale did a fantastic job of sorting through the mess, the only thing missing for me, Jack Whicher thoughts on this case; it seems to be lacking thoughts from the Detective himself after 1865.*After thought on Jack Whicher, his protege was Adolphus "Frederick Williamson", one of the leads on the Jack the Ripper case* All Round Thought-Provoking Book; Recommend.Andrea Bowhill
Kate Summerscale has produced a masterpiece of historical writing that reads like a thriller, only better because this is the true story of a horrible child murder that took place in Wiltshire, England, in 1860. Her description of the house, its inhabitants, the murder, the able detective and the local police plods is so compelling that reading about it is like taking a trip in time back to Victorian England. A rare treasure for history and crime buffs alike.
|
